GPS-Sport ForenGeneral TalkSportler des Monats ist nich fair, da gemogelt wird...
Bitte einloggen, um neue Kommentare zu erstellen Foren durchsuchen
Erste Seite<Seite11von25>Letzte Seite
axter 03.01.2012 20:35:04 UTC

do not cry !!!

it did not drop , I've adjust it to leave Erwin on the first place as he owns it.
I am just making sure that you never get on there anymore.
I can put it anytime back to how much I want , as it seems you're desperate about it :)
About the PM ...you forgot? Your ID is private as you are James Bond and you do not
want the villains knowing your whereabouts....so use your 2 devices and other stuff ,
try to see if you ever can do more than me =))
Regarding Amsterdam , if I can make the effort to go 3000 KM till there , you can catch a train too...but you wouldn't.
Also next month I will take also the speed and distance records...just to let you know that
you can say Kansas bye bye. It will never happen again with a secret profile.

LeMarquis 03.01.2012 18:36:24 UTC geändert am 03.01.2012 22:48:08 UTC



Well, thank you for proving my point... you're not just a kid, you're a baby with high levels of testosterone.
That's a great map you're showing us here... I see you've been cycling in Europe, Australia, America and even the South Pacific... all in 1 month! Without being amongst the highest rankings of total distances. Incredible! You didn't even show up on the homepage as one of the 3 highest ranked athletes and in fact you didn't show up anywhere except for the highest amount of calories burned, which (not surprisingly) today dropped from about 107000 to 36140.
When I use a HRM my amount of calories burned while cycling is about 30kCal/km, which is just above the amount without using a HRM. In your case it's about 100 kCal/km. So please don't give me this b*llsh*t.
And by the way... The Netherlands are bigger than just Amsterdam. If you want to race me, that's fine with me, but I don't see the point. It's just alpha-male behaviour, so I'd rather race with someone who knows how to behave like an adult.
Anyway... I don't think this discussion is interesting to anyone but you so if you want to call me names or show me pictures of your muscles than please start a new thread or PM me.
I wish you peace of mind and lots of wisdom for 2012...

Regards,

LeMarquis
axter 03.01.2012 17:05:41 UTC

HRM , trainings

Learn how to loose , as you did not learn how to win.
Majority of my trainings were live and with HRM , that gives the real no of calories.
The ones without are giving an inflated count.
If you really think you're good , I can race you anytime . Will be in Amsterdam sometime in the summer
and if you want to see my trainings , here they are
[1]Get your own medicine
LeMarquis 03.01.2012 01:39:19 UTC geändert am 03.01.2012 02:07:05 UTC

Always happy.

Hi Axter,

First of all: Please stop behaving like a child and start acting like a man. This is not a kindergarten.
Secondly: You're not proving that others are cheating. You're proving that:
- a) You're a great athlete OR
- b) You don't practice what you preach. So you're the one who's cheating.
If you really burned more than 100k kCal's last month you'd earn some respect. But my guess is that you deliberately perpetrated a fraud. I've seen your recordings (before you made your profile private) and all values were way too high to be correct. So I wonder... are you willing to have your recordings being verified by the Run.GPS staff, just like me?
Subsequently: I'm always happy... regardless of my place in the rankings. I'm happy because I know all my trainings are valid, I enjoy my sports and I managed to keep my weight at the same level. My place in the rankings doesn't effect any of those things. I hope you're happy too and if this is the way you want to get to the top I won't stop you. I just hope you know there are many others who play it fair and I hope you won't spoil their fun.

Now, I think you've had your fair share of attention so let me get back to this subject in a more general way:
The Hall of Fame will not only stand or fall with the quality of the plausibility check and the correctness of the calculated calorie consumption, but also with the honesty of it's members. I think the Run.GPS team is doing a great job when it comes to checking the validity of a training. But when it comes to calorie consumption there are many ways to get false results (whether deliberate or not), so it all depends on honesty whether the data is correct or not.
For example, I've seen:
- Users who use a HRM and consume twice as many calories (or more) than those who don't. I've seen values up to about 80 kCals/km cycling. This might also be a "false weight" issue.
- Users who use a H
axter 02.01.2012 11:40:21 UTC

are you happy now as I am taking the no 1 spot forever ?

And in my case I really do the exercises
LeMarquis 31.10.2011 19:25:14 UTC



"Puscht"

Bedeutungen:

[1] regional, salopp für Wasser lassen, urinieren
[2] jemanden oder etwas in eine unverdient hohe Position bringen

I'm pretty sure it's not option 1.
If it's option 2... see my previous messages and search someone else to pick on because I'm getting a bit tired of it. All my traing data is valid and this can be affirmed by the Run.GPS team. Same goes for rallymiguel and rblansays. I don't question their honesty. In case of rallymiguel it just seems a bad recording. I don't know what happened there with rblansays trainingdata but as you can read below this will be solved by the Run.GPS team.

Grtz,

LeMarquis
LeMarquis 31.10.2011 19:00:23 UTC



What the hell is "puscht"? Is that a bad thing? ;-)
Rallymiguels training just seems to be a bad recording and therefore its marked as non-plausible so it doesn't affect the stats, whereas rblansays recording does affect the stats (although it shouldn't).

Grtz,

LeMarquis.
Wallydee 31.10.2011 18:52:25 UTC

Nicht nur Le Marquis puscht hier,

auch Rallymiguel tut dieses!
http://www.gps-sport.net/trainings/running_720578
damit sollte er gute Chancen beim New York Marathon haben. Grins.....

Wallydee
LeMarquis 31.10.2011 18:01:57 UTC

Duplicate trainings

Hi Tom,

Thanks for the quick reply!
I hope this solves the problem. :)

Grtz,

LeMarquis
Tom 31.10.2011 09:53:35 UTC



Hi LeMarquis,

The problem of duplicate training entries could be caused by several reasons:
- a technical issue (which we don't know yet)
- a user trying to use data from an old recording when he or she did not take his smartphone or if the GPS failed or something similar

How we'll react:

We'll add another plausibility filter that checks if the training start timestamp matches the timestamps of the actual data in the training.

So these trainings won't be counted.

Erste Seite<Seite11von25>Letzte Seite
© 2026 | Impressum | Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen | Nutzungsbedigungen | Datenschutzerklärung |